Showing posts with label one minute manager. Show all posts
Showing posts with label one minute manager. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Effective Leadership with Footprints






Effective Leadership with Footprints: Where do yours lead you?


When we think of leadership and footprints, we tend to only think of the mark a leader leaves on their followers and organization. But let’s look at the footprints from the literal perspective. Just imagine you could see your footprints as you travel throughout your organization on any given day, what would they tell you about your leadership style.

When I was a Wal-Mart manager the concept of footprints was constantly drilled into us. The concept is an easy one, what if you could see your footprints from above as you travel throughout the workplace. Now, most managers and leaders tend to stick to the main aisles, hallways, corridors, etc. as they come and go, conduct business, and attend meetings. However, the thing to remember is where the majority of the work is performed. Unfortunately, it’s not in these aisles, hallways, or corridors. If we’re going to lead people, we need to spend time with them. Management by walking around is the same concept, however, I believe the term footprints is a much better word. Managing by walking around doesn’t necessarily mean a manager is traveling every area which work is performed, nor when it is performed.

When I first became a manager, I read the best-selling book, “The One Minute Manager”, which many people would remember talked about setting goals, praising and reprimands. I have heard many people over the years say this book is common sense, and you know what, they’re right. If we all can agree “The One Minute Manager” is just common sense, it raises the question, why isn’t done in every workplace by every leader?

If we compare the One Minute Manager to the concept of footprints, it can be clearly seen how leading effectively involves one very important element, spending time with the people you’re leading. For those of your who are Doctor Who fans, the concept of “space and time” is something we have heard many times. Now take the concept of footprints and apply it to space and time. This is something I have always done and is the way Wal-Mart trained me. If we think of our places of work as the spatial component, and the time aspect as all the different time's work is performed, for example, days, evenings, and midnight shifts, we can clearly see when the work is performed. If you’re a leader, are you responsible for leading people on different shifts then you normally work? If so, do you ever make the time shift to spend time on those alternate shifts where your people are?

When I was with Wal-Mart and MDS labs, I had people who worked only evenings, nights and/or weekends, which meant I needed to spend time on those different shifts so I could not only see what was being done but to also provide those shifts with the leadership they deserved and required.  Yes, this can be difficult, however, spending time with your employees is key in developing a successful team.

How often have we seen situations such as these;

Bob, a new manager with ABC Tech started his fourth week with frustration over issues arising from the weekend shift with quality and budgets. He decides to ask John for help since he has been with the company for years. He asks John, “what is it they do on the weekends that requires so many people, and why with so many people are there quality issues?” Bob becomes even more frustrated when he hears John’s answer, “I don’t know”. You ask him to elaborate, however, he only replies, he doesn’t know want they do on weekends.

If I were Bob, I would rearrange my schedule and work some weekends to spend time with my people I’m responsible for leading. This is the sort of thing I did when I was management with Wal-Mart and MDS. It’s amazing the effect this has on the team, not only do they see you as a leader who takes the time and initiative to spend time with them, but also someone who is approachable, and willing to help. This has the effect of increasing morale and overall performance. One thing employees do not like to hear their manager say is “I don’t know what you do”, in cases like this the employee usually have thoughts of how do you expect to manage and lead us.

Another situation many of us have experienced is:

Sally, transferred to the HR division of Techy Tech three months ago and is starting to feel as if she is not doing a good job. She came from a small branch in the Maritimes where she would often see her manager who regularly provided feedback on her performance. Now that she’s in the much larger branch in Toronto, she has only seen her manager a few times since she’s been there. During lunch one day she asks Peter, “What could I being doing wrong?” Peter asks “what makes you think you’re doing something wrong?” Sally tells Peter she never sees her manager and in three months has never received any feedback on her performance. Peter Laughs, and tells her that’s what is like around here, “if nothing is said, then you’re doing a good job. No news is good news”

How many times have we heard or experienced a similar story? Looking at these stories, the thing lacking in both is the leader spending time with their people. By utilizing Footprints in both space and time, situations such as these can be eliminated. The benefits are huge, employees will feel better about their work and who are more engaged, especially during times of change management and uncertainty in the organization. 

We all know how difficult it can be at times to manage workload, however, leaders need to better understand, when they have a highly effective team which produce high-quality work, a leader’s job becomes that much easier especially when it comes to their other responsibilities such as reports, budgets, meetings, follow-up, setting and managing goals, etc.

Things to remember when walking around the work area:

  •        Remember to spend time with each employee, do not simply walk through the work area.
  •        Praise your employees, a pat on the back goes a long way
  •        Observe the workflow, how is it affecting your team, good or bad
  •        Remember to take notes, these will come in handy during performance reviews and will aid       in setting goals
  •        Share information
  •     Follow-up, follow-up, follow-up,

 The only way we can effectively lead your people is to spend quality time with them, remember praising and reprimanding people, and setting goals works best when you see them in the work area performing their duties, this is the best time to praise them for their hard work and correct actions which need attention. Far too many times we see leaders who are disconnected from their employees, and then wonder why things aren’t going well for the organization.



Friday, September 30, 2016

Comparison of Leadership Theories (Path-Goal & Situational)

Path-Goal Leadership

The path-goal leadership theory, as the name implies, is the path to accomplishing goals through increasing employee motivation. A leader’s role can be divided into two categories, the path to the end result and the rewards which will be tailored to achieve the desired motivation. In this theory, it is the leadership behavior which is changed based on the situation. It’s important to remember a leader is responsible for defining goals, clear a path, and eliminate any hurdles, by doing these three things, a leader can help their followers achieve their goals. Leadership behaviors can be broken down into four categories;

•  Supportive: leadership is based on supporting the needs of the employee, and fosters team building.

•  Directive: this leadership style the employees are told exactly what to do and how to do it. Leaders ensure proper procedure is followed.

•  Achievement-oriented: goals are set and employees are encouraged to continuously improve.

•  Participative styles: leaders encourage support from the team. Employees participate in the decisions being made.
  
Situational Leadership

The situational leadership theory involves the abilities/attitudes of the employees and the situation itself. This theory is divvied into four styles, which all have to do with the difference in the willingness of the employees. The leadership style utilized in a particular situation will depend on the follower’s readiness or maturity as described by Warren Blank, Stephen Green, and John R. Weitzel in their article A Test of the Situational Leadership Theory”. 

•  Directing: there is an increased concern for the established goals and less for the employee. The leader provided complete instructions. (Low follower readiness)

•  Coaching: equal attention is paid to both the task and employees. (Moderate follower readiness)

•  Supporting: increased attention towards supporting the followers and less on the task, participation from the followers in decision making is encouraged. (High follower readiness)

•  Entrusting: responsibility is given to the team for the given task. Very little support or direction is given to the team. (Very high follower readiness)

Theory comparison

The path-goal and Situational leadership theories both have their similarities and differences. The main focus of the path-goal theory is motivation, what the followers need to complete the task. In contrast, the situational theory is based on the readiness or maturity of the followers; how capable are they? Within each of the two theories, the breakdown of styles is very similar. They both have a directing category in which the leader’s main attention is given to providing directions, and a supporting style which fosters team building and encourages followers to participate in the decision making.

I believe the path-goal theory is the most effective. This leadership theory motivates the followers to perform and the tasks are clearly set and goals communicated; hence, rewards are a large factor in achieving the set goals. 

Similar to the situational theory, the leadership behavior is determined by how capable the followers are. Whether a leader chooses the path-goal or situational theory, I believe people skills play an important role. A leader needs to effectively understand what motivates the followers and what they are capable of doing. By relying on their people skills, leaders can ensure they utilize the proper leadership style; for example, morale could be greatly affected if a directing style is used with highly competent staff. Likewise, the end result may be undesirable if an entrusting style is used with staff who are not competent and require more direction.

References

Blank, W., Weitzel, J. R., & Green, S. G. (1990). A Test of the Situational Leadership Theory. Personnel Psychology, 43(3), 579-597.

Daft, R. L. (2014). The leadership experience (Sixth ed.). Australia: Cengage Learning


Landrum, N., & Daily, C. (2012). Corporate Accountability: A Path-Goal Perspective.        International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 450-62.